Cases 21 - 30 of 554
MAYES v. MITCHELL
as 3:2023cv00182
Plaintiff:
KENNETH Q. MAYES
Defendant:
DAN MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALL v. GASKINS
as 1:2023cv01919
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL P. HALL
Defendant:
RICHARD GASKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STRONG v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 3:2023cv00179
Plaintiff:
SEAN STRONG
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, ARAMARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MITCHELL v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2023cv07065
Plaintiff:
KAREN MITCHELL
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED, COOK GROUP INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MITCHELL v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION
as 1:2023cv01711
Plaintiff:
Andre Mitchell
Defendant:
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
A.C. v. MCCANN et al
as 1:2023cv01592
Plaintiff:
A. C.
Defendant:
CANDICE MCCANN and SUE MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF INDIANA v. MV REALTY OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01578
Defendant:
AMANDA J. ZACHMAN, ANTONY MITCHELL, MV REALTY OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
MCGHEE et al v. DOWELL et al
as 3:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL MCGHEE and EUGENE RADCLIFF
Defendant:
JORDAN DOWELL, JORDAN CARR, ZACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taebel v. Swift
as 2:2023cv00258
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Taebel and Mitch Taebel
Defendant:
Taylor Swift
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Mace et al
as 3:2023cv00694
Plaintiff:
Victor L Jordan and Victor Lee Jordan
Defendant:
T Mace, K Mace, Guzman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
