Cases 21 - 30 of 528
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wilcox v. State of Ohio et al
as 2:2023cv02477
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Wilcox
Defendant:
State of Ohio, Lancaster Correctional Institution, C.O. Whitey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02319
Plaintiff:
Joan Mitchell
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mitchell v. Great Lakes Cold Storage
as 1:2023cv01333
Plaintiff:
Lavaris Mitchell
Defendant:
Great Lakes Cold Storage
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mitchell, Jr. et al v. WGU Corporation
as 1:2023cv01332
Plaintiff:
Ryan Mitchell, Jr. and Brady Misner
Defendant:
WGU Corporation
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act/Junk Fax Prevention Act
Mitchell v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02112
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Marie Mitchell
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hill v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 1:2023cv00406
Defendant:
Jane/John Doe, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Genesis Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv01922
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Tyra Latisha Mitchell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Mitchell v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2023cv01169
Plaintiff:
Brian Mitchell
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Sprouse v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2023cv00353
Plaintiff:
Ruben T. Sprouse
Defendant:
Miria Mitchell, Melissa Coburn, Ricky Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
