Cases 21 - 30 of 1,609
MITCHELL v. 711 ELEVEN
as 2:2024cv00604
Plaintiff:
PAUL F. MITCHELL
Defendant:
711 ELEVEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
MITCHELL v. BROAD STREET MINISTRY et al
as 2:2024cv00603
Plaintiff:
PAUL F. MITCHELL
Defendant:
BROAD STREET MINISTRY, STAFF and MAINTENCE WORKER STAFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
MITCHELL v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv00602
Plaintiff:
PAUL F. MITCHELL
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER MARNAH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
MITCHELL v. BROWN et al
as 2:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
PAUL F. MITCHELL
Defendant:
JAZMIN BROWN, OUR BROTHERS PLACE, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SAVAGE v. PURDUE PHARMA et al
as 2:2023cv04830
Plaintiff:
KEVIN EDWARD SAVAGE
Defendant:
PURDUE PHARMA, JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, MCKESSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ocker-Mullen v. USA
as 4:2023cv01981
Petitioner:
Mitchell Ocker-Mullen
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
MITCHELL v. GARCI
as 2:2023cv04358
Plaintiff:
JANNIE MITCHELL
Defendant:
LUIS GARCI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MITCHELL v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL
as 2:2023cv01710
Plaintiff:
MISTER MITCHELL
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HEAPS v. COUNTY OF CHESTER et al
as 2:2023cv03833
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN HEAPS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CHESTER, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER DURAN, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER PRESWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
