Cases 21 - 30 of 78
Stine v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2018cv00684
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Mary M. Mitchell, Sara Revell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emiel Kandi v. Steve Langford, et al
as 18-55201
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EMIEL A. KANDI
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVE LANGFORD, Warden, Lompoc FCI, liable individually, in their official capacities, RAY GARCIA, Associate Warden, Lompoc, FCI, liable individually, in their official capacities, JOHN BRANNAN, Lompoc Mailroom Complex Supervisor, liable individually, in their official capacities and others
Lewis v. Grassley et al
as 3:2018cv00184
Defendant:
Ian Connors, Doctor Andrew Grassley, Doctor Jennifer Hunter and others
Plaintiff:
Julianna Marie Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Tiedemann v. Mitchell et al
as 4:2017cv00597
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Daniel Tiedemann
Defendant:
Mary M Mitchell, JT Shartle and Rafael Zuniga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Emiel A. Kandi v. Steven Langford et al
as 2:2017cv07650
Defendant:
James Binnebose, John Brannan, Ms Unknown Castillo and others
Plaintiff:
Emiel A. Kandi
Winchel v. United States of America et al
as 4:2017cv00479
Plaintiff:
Christian Charles Winchel
Defendant:
United States of America, M County, D Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fykes v. Zuniga et al
as 1:2017cv00344
Plaintiff:
Michael Alvarez Fykes
Defendant:
Rafael Zuniga , S Scott and Mary M. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vahe Tahmasian v. Lieutenant Colon et al
as 2:2017cv00558
Defendant:
Lieutenant Colon, Ian Connors, Warden Conrad M. Graber and others
Plaintiff:
Vahe Tahmasian
Falcon v. Fox et al.
as 2:2016cv02645
Petitioner:
Yoba Falcon
Respondent:
Jack Fox and Mary M. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Marcus Wright v. J. Shartle, et al
as 16-17033
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARCUS DESHAWN WRIGHT
Respondent - Appellee:
J. T. SHARTLE, MARY M. MITCHELL, Regional Director of Tucson USP and CHARLES E. SAMUELS, BOP Director
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
