Cases 21 - 30 of 79
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00612
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
RIGHT TRACK MANAGEMENT INC. et al v. JUNIATA COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CLINIC, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv03353
Plaintiff:
RIGHT TRACK MANAGEMENT INC. and FARES YASIN
Defendant:
JUNIATA COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CLINIC, INC., LEONARD BROWN, NORRIS HANCOCK, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TERRELL v. 19TH DISTRICT POLICE STATION et al
as 2:2017cv02536
Plaintiff:
MARK TERRELL
Defendant:
19TH DISTRICT POLICE STATION, CLIFFORD DOORLEY, DANIEL ORTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ACOSTA et al v. DEMOCRATIC CITY COMMITTEE et al
as 2:2017cv01462
Plaintiff:
ORLANDO A. ACOSTA and EDWARD LLOYD
Defendant:
DEMOCRATIC CITY COMMITTEE, EMILIO VAZQUEZ, CARLOS MATOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRANTLEY et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv02489
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE BRANTLEY and JONI RICE-BRANTLEY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , CHARLES H. RAMSEY , SEAN DEVLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATOS v. SAMUELS et al
as 3:2015cv00273
Plaintiff:
REYNOSO MATOS
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, GEORGE C. WIGEN, MS. N. GREENLEAF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VONSCHLICHTEN v. WETZEL et al
as 5:2015cv05967
Plaintiff:
ERIC VONSCHLICHTEN
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, MICHAEL GREEN, JOHN BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MATOS FOOD MARKET, INC. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2015cv05390
Plaintiff:
MATOS FOOD MARKET, INC.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 2023
MATOS v. WIGEN
as 3:2015cv00177
Petitioner:
REYNOSO MATOS
Respondent:
G. C. WIGEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
