Cases 21 - 30 of 40
GILLIS et al v. MAJOR ENERGY et al
as 2:2014cv03856
Plaintiff:
BARBARA GILLIS , THOMAS GILLIS , SCOTT R. and others
Defendant:
MAJOR ENERGY and RESPOND POWER, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
MCCLELLAND v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2013cv00364
Plaintiff:
LAVONNE MARIE MCCLELLAND
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Banks v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 1:2013cv02664
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, Graig Buck, Michael Metrinko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STROUGO v. UNITEK GLOBAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv02580
Plaintiff:
ROBERT STROUGO
Defendant:
UNITEK GLOBAL SERVICES, INC., C. SCOTT HISEY, ROCCO ROMANELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
HARVEY v. UNITEK GLOBAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv02514
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HARVEY
Defendant:
UNITEK GLOBAL SERVICES, INC., C. SCOTT HISEY, ROCCO ROMANELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
MINOTTI v. UNITEK GLOBAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv02119
Plaintiff:
ALFRED MINOTTI
Defendant:
UNITEK GLOBAL SERVICES, INC., C. SCOTT HISEY, ROCCO ROMANELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01745
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GRACE v. MCCLELLAND
as 2:2011cv01286
Plaintiff:
FRAZIER GRACE
Defendant:
DONNA J. MCCLELLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
