Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Gresham #272603 et al v. Mutschler et al
as 2:2012cv00012
Plaintiff:
Michael Gresham #272603 and Ralph Proctor #297924
Defendant:
Kathleen A. Mutschler, P. Johns, Kristi Kangas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramsey #571624 v. McMahon et al
as 2:2011cv00307
Plaintiff:
John Ramsey #571624, II
Defendant:
Melissa LaPlaunt, Kevin Rourk, Greg McQuiggin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Solomon #301631 v. Golloday et al
as 2:2011cv00287
Defendant:
Unknown Golloday, Glen Carol, Patricia L. Caruso and others
Plaintiff:
Martin T. Solomon #301631
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plasterers Local 67 Pension Trust Fund et al v. Martin McMahon Plastering, Inc.
as 2:2011cv11602
Plaintiff:
Plasterers Local 67 Pension Trust Fund , Plasterers Apprenticeship Trust Fund and Michigan Trowel Trades Health & Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Martin McMahon Plastering, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
McMahon v. Citimortgage
as 2:2010cv14265
Plaintiff:
Kelly McMahon
Defendant:
Citimortgage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shaffer et al v. Comerica Incorporated et al
as 2:2007cv15425
Plaintiff:
Lori Shaffer and Dearborn Speech and Sensory Center, Incorporated
Defendant:
Comerica Incorporated, Comerica Incorporated, Jim Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
International Outdoor v. Romulus, City of et al
as 2:2007cv15125
Plaintiff:
International Outdoor and International Outdoor
Defendant:
Romulus, City of and Randy McMahon
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
McMahon v. RJM Acquisitions, LLC
as 2:2007cv13151
Plaintiff:
Sean McMahon
Defendant:
RJM Acquisitions, LLC
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Wilbon #162532 v. Baran et al
as 1:2007cv00322
Plaintiff:
Louis Anthony Wilbon #162532
Defendant:
Lawrence Baran, Rachael Waterbury, Donald J. Matson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
