Cases 21 - 30 of 7,956
WOLFPACK BOXING, INC. v. WOLFPACK BOXING CLUB MIAMI
as 2:2024cv00780
Plaintiff:
Wolfpack Boxing, Inc. dba Wolfpack Boxing Club
Defendant:
Wolfpack Boxing Club Miami
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
BILLINGS CLINIC et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv01546
Plaintiff:
BILLINGS CLINIC, BOTSFORD GENERAL HOSPITAL doing business as BEAUMONT HEALTH - FARMINGTON HILLS, CAMDEN-CLARK MEMORIAL HOSPITAL doing business as CAMDEN CLARK MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Samuel Smith, Jr. v. City of Miami, et al
as 24-11696
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL LEE SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
CITY OF MIAMI and ERIC MARTI
Samuel Smith, Jr. v. Jesus Valdivia, et al
as 24-11700
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL LEE SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
JESUS VALDIVIA and THE CITY OF MIAMI BEACH
Cubanos Pa'lante et al v. Florida House of Representatives et al
as 1:2024cv21983
Plaintiff:
Cubanos Pa'lante, Engage Miami, Inc., FIU ACLU Club and others
Defendant:
Florida House of Representatives and Florida Secretary of State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21985
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21986
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21977
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
