Cases 21 - 30 of 88
Hicks v. Cleveland Police Department et al
as 1:2017cv02229
Plaintiff:
Danell L. Hicks
Defendant:
Cleveland Police Department, Calvin Williams, Cuyahoga County City Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
American Power, LLC v. Harris et al
as 3:2017cv00347
Plaintiff:
American Power, LLC
Defendant:
Douglas O. Harris, Murray J. Crane, Michael T. Morley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01768
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Roth v. City of Canton et al
as 5:2017cv00234
Defendant:
City of Canton, Ohio, City of Canton Police Department, Shirley Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Roth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers-Transportation Division et al v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 1:2016cv02554
Petitioner:
International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers-Transportation Division , Amaziah P Barnette , Bracken R Burd and others
Respondent:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Hibbard v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2016cv00710
Plaintiff:
Michael T Hibbard
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Hatfield v. Gmoser
as 1:2016cv00579
Plaintiff:
Jasen Hatfield
Defendant:
Michael T Gmoser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hatfield v. Gmoser
as 1:2016cv00578
Plaintiff:
Jasen Hatfield
Defendant:
Michael T Gmoser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hatfield v. Gmoser
as 1:2016oe00578
Plaintiff:
Jasen Hatfield
Defendant:
Michael T Gmoser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
