Cases 21 - 30 of 140
Duncan v. Wilhelm et al
as 8:2022cv00122
Petitioner:
Daryle M. Duncan and Iman Muhammad
Respondent:
Michele Wilhelm and Scott Frakes
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
James v. Capps-Wilhelm et al
as 8:2021cv00346
Petitioner:
Ja'Mario James
Respondent:
Michelle Capps-Wilhelm and Scott Frakes
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hogquist v. Mercy Hospital et al
as 8:2021cv00302
Plaintiff:
Michelle Hogquist
Defendant:
Mercy Hospital, Anoka County Police Departments, Anoka County Sheriffs Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Muhammad v. Frakes et al
as 4:2021cv03096
Defendant:
The State of Nebraska, Scott Frakes and Michele Wilhelm
Plaintiff:
Abdur-Rashid Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Chamberlain et al
as 4:2021cv03018
Defendant:
Dr. Chamberlain, Scott R. Frakes and Michele Wilhelm
Plaintiff:
Edward Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walt v. Frakes et al
as 8:2020cv00493
Petitioner:
Kevin John Walt
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Respondent:
Scott R. Frakes and Michele Wilhelm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Abram v. Leon et al
as 8:2020cv00469
Defendant:
Larry Sohler, Leon, Stephanie Beasley and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie E. Abram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Wilhelm et al
as 8:2020cv00387
Defendant:
Dr. Deal, Robert Madsen, Michelle Wilhelm and others
Plaintiff:
Harold B. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Nebraska Department of Correction Services et al
as 8:2020cv00365
Defendant:
Spence Propel, Dayna, Brandi and others
Plaintiff:
Marvel Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
