Cases 21 - 30 of 82
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Abdirahman Aden Kariye et al v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al
as 2:2022cv01916
Plaintiff:
Abdirahman Aden Kariye, Mohamad Mouslli and Hameem Shah
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Mark Morgan, Tae D. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
De Cristo Cano et al v. Biden et al
as 3:2022cv00193
Plaintiff:
Corazon De Cristo Cano, Terry Hardin, Crystal Irvin and others
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Safer Federal Workforce Task Force, United States Office of Personnel Management and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 bb Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv01397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Francisco v. Mohamad
as 3:2021cv01013
Plaintiff:
Keelon D. Francisco
Defendant:
Dr. Amir Mohamad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Mohamad v. X-Therma Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv03858
Defendant:
X-Therma Inc. and Xiaoxi Wei
Plaintiff:
Elaa Mohamad
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730
(PS) Rhuma et al v. State of Libya
as 2:2020cv02366
Plaintiff:
Khadija Kanoun, Mohamad Laham and Taher Rhuma
Defendant:
State of Libya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1182
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
