Cases 21 - 30 of 263
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC v. CE-PRO BIKES, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00859
Plaintiff:
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T MOBILITY
Defendant:
CE-PRO BIKES, LLC doing business as PRO BIKE+ RUN and CE MONROEVILLE22, LP
Cross Defendant:
CE-PRO BIKES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC v. COGECO US (PENN) LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00727
Plaintiff:
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T MOBILITY
Defendant:
COGECO US (PENN) LLC doing business as BREEZELINE, MAICOM SOLUTIONS, LLC doing business as MAICOM LLC and STONEMILE GROUP, LLC
Cross Defendant:
L&J ERECTION, INC., RUTHRAUFF SERVICE, LLC, COGECO US (PENN) LLC and others
Cross Claimant:
CONTROLS SERVICE & ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC.
Counter Defendant:
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. City of Los Altos
as 22-16432
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, DBA AT&T Mobility
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF LOS ALTOS, a California municipal corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv06407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. The Planning Board of the Town of Corinth et al
as 1:2021cv00149
Defendant:
The Town of Corinth, The Town of Corinth Building Department and The Planning Board of the Town of Corinth
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility
Not Classified By Court:
Thomas J. Fucillo
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332 Telecommunications Act of 1996.
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. The Planning Board of the Town of East Hampton et al
as 2:2020cv03555
Defendant:
The Town of East Hampton, The Town of East Hampton Building Department, The Planning Board of the Town of East Hampton and others
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC d/b/a AT&T Mobility and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility
Intervenor Defendant:
Peter Corbett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, etal. v. Kootenai County Idaho
as 2:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, D/B/A AT&T Mobility, a Delaware LLC and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC a Delaware limited liability company doing business as A.T. and T. Mobility
Defendant:
Kootenai County Idaho
Intervenor:
Potlatch Hill Neighborhood Group, Alissa Desancic, Joel Bowlby and others
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. The Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Oyster Bay et al
as 2:2021cv03201
Defendant:
Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Oyster Bay, Planning and Development Department of the Town of Oyster Bay, Town of Oyster Bay, New York and others
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC d/b/a AT&T Mobility and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. The Village of Oyster Bay Cove, et al
as 2:2022cv07807
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility
Defendant:
The Village of Oyster Bay Cove, The Zoning Board of Appeals of The Village of Oyster Bay Cove and The Planning Board of The Village of Oyster Bay Cove
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC v. City of West Covina, California
as 2:2022cv01642
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC
Defendant:
City of West Covina, California
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Richard Copeland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
