Cases 21 - 30 of 65
Nails v. Savannah Plastic Surgery et al
as 4:2021cv00153
Plaintiff:
Angela Nails
Defendant:
Savannah Plastic Surgery and Scott W. Vann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nails v. Chatham County Tax Commission
as 4:2021cv00033
Plaintiff:
Angela Nails
Defendant:
Chatham County Tax Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nails v. City Chatham County Tax Commission
as 4:2021cv00032
Plaintiff:
Angela Nails
Defendant:
City Chatham County Tax Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Shields v. Prior et al
as 1:2020cv04844
Defendant:
Michael W. Nail and William A. Prior, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Matthew Donald Shields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradley v. Beckom et al
as 3:2020cv00163
Petitioner:
Austin Zachary Bradley
Respondent:
Carrollton Department of Community Supervision, Michael T. Beckom and Michael W. Nail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vincent v. Floyd County Police Department et al
as 1:2020cv03503
Defendant:
Jim McCormick, Richard Matthews, Jeff Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Darren Allan Vincent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Nail
as 1:2020cv03109
Petitioner:
Derrick Brooks
Respondent:
State of Georgia, Judge John M. Ott and Michael W. Nail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
IOU CENTRAL INC v. DO et al
as 1:2020cv02075
Defendant:
HOANG M. DO, LUXE ENTERPRISES INC, LUX NAILS and others
Plaintiff:
IOU Central, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis et al v. Habif Properties et al
as 1:2020cv01542
Plaintiff:
Tiram D. Lewis, Hon. Israel Saladin-Selassie, Prince Israel Saladin-Selassie and others
Defendant:
Walmart Super Center, Habif Properties, Beauty Queen Alterations and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MILLER v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, et al
as 4:2020cv00002
Defendant:
MICHAEL W NAIL, Georgia Department of Community Supervision, Sean Carroll Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L. Miller and JENNIFER L MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
