Cases 21 - 30 of 309
Robert LeClair v. James Dzurenda, et al
as 23-15334
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ROBERT LECLAIR
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES DZURENDA, MICHAEL MINEV, DR. MARTIN NAUGHTON and others
Defendant:
CHARLES DANIELS and HAROLD WICKHAM
McCabe v. Daniels et al
as 3:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
Dennis McCabe
Defendant:
Charles Daniels, Aaron Ford, Dr M Naughton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Roy Naughton
as 23-30021
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROY NAUGHTON, AKA Thumper
Hermanson v. Naughton et al
as 3:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
James Hermanson
Defendant:
Dr. Naughton, Nurse Mitchell and Middlton
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronald Mulder v. Marks, et al
as 23-15090
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD J. MULDER
Defendant / Appellee:
MARKS, Dr., NAUGHTON, Dr., ROMEO ARANAS and others
Thomas Brunsen v. Isidro Baca, et al
as 22-16987
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS BRUNSEN
Defendant / Appellee:
ISIDRO BACA, Warden, DR. MINEV, DR. NAUGHTON and others
FINNEMEN v. SHIMBERG et al
as 1:2022cv07523
Plaintiff:
NASIR FINNEMAN and NASIR FINNEMEN
Defendant:
CHARLES SHIMBERG, FRANCES BLAUN-NAUGHTON, STEVEN J. PETERSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Johnson v. Nevada Department of Corrections Medical Department et al
as 3:2022cv00552
Plaintiff:
Mardell Maurice Johnson
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections Medical Department, Dr. Naughton, Dr. Marks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Thompson v. Isidro Baca, et al
as 22-16702
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID C. THOMPSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ISIDRO BACA, Warden, BRIAN SANDEVAL, ADAM LAXSULT and others
Defendant:
JOHNS, Dr. Terminated per FAC
Naughton v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv00221
Plaintiff:
Tammy D. Naughton
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
