Cases 21 - 30 of 123
Morrison v. Doe
as 7:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
Bobby Morrison
Defendant:
John Doe (7:23-CV-103-O)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrison v. Doe 3:23-cv-2190
as 7:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
Bobby Morrison
Defendant:
John Doe 3:23-cv-2190
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrison v. Doe 3:23-cv-2190
as 3:2023cv02190
Plaintiff:
Bobby Morrison
Defendant:
John Doe 3:23-cv-2190
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manuel v. Thorton, et al
as 5:2023cv00226
Plaintiff:
Tommy Joe Manuel, Jr
Defendant:
Lamesa City Police Department, Officer FNU LNU 5:23-CV-226-H, Lt. FNU Thorton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson vs. Unknown Defendant 4:23-cv-985-O
as 4:2023cv00985
Plaintiff:
Mark Darrell Robertson
Defendant:
State of Texas and Unknown Defendant 4:23-cv-985-O
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salazar v. LNU 5:23-CV-221
as 5:2023cv00221
Petitioner:
Ryan C. Salazar
Respondent:
FNU LNU 5:23-CV-221 and Lubbock County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
White v. The State of Texas et al
as 4:2023cv00925
Plaintiff:
Jacob White
Defendant:
The State of Texas, The City of Grapevine, Bruno Rumbelow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Graham v. Waybourn
as 4:2023cv00907
Petitioner:
Gladys Maria Graham
Respondent:
Unknown Defendants (4:23-CV-907-O) and Warden Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Morrison v. Doe (7:23-CV-88-O)
as 7:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
Bobby Morrison
Defendant:
John Doe (7:23-CV-88-O)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Rowe et al
as 5:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
Charles Young
Defendant:
Kelly Rowe, FNU LNU 5:23-CV-190-H-1 and FNU LNU 5:23-CV-190-H-2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
