Cases 21 - 30 of 41
United States of America v. Roman (Gonzalez)
as 14-1956
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Wilfredo Abrahante, AKA Twin, Eluid Rivera, AKA Smoke, AKA Smokey, Milton Roman, AKA Justice and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Luis Gonzalez, AKA Oso
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01860
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Fabio Noel-Rodriguez
as 13-30175
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
FABIO NOEL-RODRIGUEZ
Salvador et al v. Keanes Custom Cabinets, Inc. et al
as 0:2013cv60963
Plaintiff:
Luis Salvador , Jose Alexis Garcia , Noel Rodriguez, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Keanes Custom Cabinets, Inc. and Patrick Keane
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0704 Labor Litigation
Noel Rodriguez v. David Long
as 12-17730
Petitioner - Appellant:
NOEL RODRIGUEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID B. LONG
MacNamara v. City of New York
as 12-4483
Plaintiff:
Chris J. Kornicke, Julia Cohen, Julia Cohen and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Stacy Cotler, Rachel Heinold, Danielle Walsh and others
Defendant:
David Cohen, Deputy Commissioner for Legal Matters, New York City Police Department
Defendant - Appellant:
City of New York, a municipal entity, Michael Bloomberg, Mayor of the City of New York, Raymond Kelly, New York City Police Commissioner and others
United States of America v. Segura (Lopez)
as 12-4147
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William Lopez, AKA Willie
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Rodolfo Segura, AKA Rodalfo, AKA Rudolfo, AKA Rudalfo, AKA Rudy, Jose Orlando Pena, Cielo Melendez and others
Noel Rodriguez v. David Long
as 12-17210
Petitioner - Appellant:
NOEL RODRIGUEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID B. LONG
Noel Rodriguez v. Isaac, et al
as 12-16941
Petitioner - Appellant:
NOEL RODRIGUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
ISAAC, Counselor and KEN CLARK, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
