Cases 21 - 30 of 507
Rigsby v. Corder, et al
as 23-7048
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS RAY RIGSBY, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
SGT. CORDER, CPL. HAYES, Oklahoma State Penitentiary, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6091
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
White v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-6085
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICKEY WHITE
Respondent / Appellee:
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and CARL BEAR, Deputy Director
White v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv00527
Petitioner:
Rickey White
Respondent:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections and David Cule
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
White v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv00528
Petitioner:
Rickey White
Respondent:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections and Carl Bear
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-6075
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICKEY WHITE
Respondent / Appellee:
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and CARL BEAR, Deputy Director
Simpson v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections
as 5:2023cv00437
Petitioner:
Michael Laroy Simpson
Respondent:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Thomas v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
Nor T. Thomas, Jr.
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Mark Knutson, David Louthan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Harpe
as 23-5041
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT EUGENE KING
Respondent / Appellee:
STEVEN HARPE, Director, Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Hood v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv00265
Plaintiff:
Jeff Hood
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections and Josh Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
