Cases 21 - 30 of 35
BILLINGS v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2012cv01829
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN and BARACK OBAMA
Plaintiff:
EDDIE HAROLD BILLINGS, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HUGHES v. OBAMA
as 1:2012cv01253
Plaintiff:
MARK S. HUGHES
Defendant:
BARACK OBAMA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUGHES v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2012cv00916
Plaintiff:
MARK S. HUGHES
Defendant:
JANE MAGNUS-STINSON, BARACK OBAMA, JENNIFER A. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUGHES v OBAMA et al
as 1:2012mc00027
Plaintiff:
MARK S. HUGHES
Defendant:
JANE MAGNUS-STINSON, BARACK OBAMA and ZINK
USA et al v. Obama et al
as 2:2011cv00480
Plaintiff:
USA and K K Roy
Defendant:
BH Obama, Michelle Obama, FEC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NORINGTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2011cv01095
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER EDWIN G. BUSS, GOVERNOR MITCH E. DANIELS, JR., INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
LAKESHA NORINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Arias v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 3:2011cv00191
Plaintiff:
Pedro Gutierrez Arias
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents and Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. KIELY et al
as 3:2011cv00013
Defendant:
DEPUTY MATT F. KEPPLER, FBI AGENT BRIAN FLAHERTY, FORMER CONGRESSMAN BRAD ELLSWORTH and others
Plaintiff:
JESHA DONALDSON MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
TURNER v. SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS et al
as 3:2010cv00174
Defendant:
MR. PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA and SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. TURNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GERVACIO v. SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS et al
as 1:2010cv01388
Plaintiff:
RODRIGO ABAD GERVACIO
Defendant:
MR. PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA and SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
