Cases 21 - 30 of 131
Pearson v. Bonner et al
as 1:2020cv04410
Defendant:
SunTrust Bank, Truist, Brock & Scott, PLLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jakim Edward Pearson, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Coley-Pearson v. Martin et al
as 5:2020cv00151
Defendant:
Emily Misty Martin, Joe Stewart, The City of Douglas and others
Plaintiff:
Olivia Coley-Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson et al v. Kemp et al
as 1:2020cv04809
Defendant:
Anh Le, Matthew Mashburn, Brad Raffensperger and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Jay Van Gundy, Coreco Jaqan Pearson, Cathleen Alston Latham and others
Intervenor Defendant:
DCCC, DSCC and Democratic Party of Georgia, Inc.
Intervenor:
Alice O'Lenick, Stephen Day, Ben Satterfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yates v. Warren et al
as 1:2020cv04516
Defendant:
Major Bains, Cobb County S.W.A.T. Team, Major Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Arshade Jayquane Yates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blochowicz v. Wilkie et al
as 1:2020cv00111
Defendant:
Joan Weber, Robert Wilkie, Michelle Cox-Henley and others
Plaintiff:
Kimberly M. Blochowicz and Jeffrey M. Blochowicz
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Pearson v. Lee Arrendale State Prison et al
as 2:2020cv00079
Defendant:
Lee Arrendale State Prison and B+F SMU
Plaintiff:
Sandtoro E. Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. JEMT Enterprises LLC et al
as 1:2020cv01239
Defendant:
Jeff Glatzer and JEMT Enterprises LLC
Plaintiff:
Lamel Pearson
BARNES v. TOBY et al
as 5:2020cv00047
Plaintiff:
OTIS L BARNES
Defendant:
PEARSON, OFFICER IVEY, TOBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. Toby et al
as 4:2020cv00024
Defendant:
Sgt. Pearson, Hill, Ivey and others
Plaintiff:
Otis L. Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00096
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
