Cases 21 - 30 of 99
Justin Wright v. Jane Doe et al
as 6:2021cv00280
Plaintiff:
Justin Wright
Defendant:
TDCJ-CID Director, TDCJ State Classification Committee, Corr. Officer Patrice L. Petty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petty v. Dr. Fryman et al
as 4:2021cv00814
Plaintiff:
Adolphus Petty
Defendant:
Dr. Fryman and FMC-Carswell Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petty v. King et al
as 4:2021cv00823
Plaintiff:
Adolphus Petty
Defendant:
Warden FNU King, Assistant Warden FNU Harris and Head Doctor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petty v. Pinnegle Point LLC et al
as 3:2021cv01390
Defendant:
Pinnegle Point LLC doing business as Pinnacle Point Food Mart and Kelechukwu Ukaumunna
Plaintiff:
Tina Petty
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Martin v. Petty et al
as 4:2021cv00295
Plaintiff:
Keith Martin
Defendant:
Aaron Petty, John Sanders and City of Houston, Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Petty v. State Automobile Mutual Insurance Company
as 4:2021cv00036
Plaintiff:
Candace Petty
Defendant:
State Automobile Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bennett v. Hill County Jail et al
as 6:2020cv00811
Defendant:
Zonelle Orozco, Scott Rowe, Hill County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2020cv00561
Defendant:
U.T.M.B., Al W. Schorre, Jr., State of Texas and others
Plaintiff:
Oscar L. Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petty v. Frontier Communications Corporation
as 3:2020cv01197
Plaintiff:
John A Petty
Defendant:
Frontier Communications Corporation
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Patricia Johnson v. TRG Customer Solutions, Inc.
as 5:2019cv01463
Defendant:
TRG CUSTOMER SOLUTIONS, INC. D/B/A IBEX GLOBAL SOLUTIONS and TRG Customer Solutions, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Patricia Johnson, Rachael Ranick, MarQuise Love and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
