Cases 21 - 30 of 87
Lloyd Emerson Earl Palmer, II v. Dunn et al
as 4:2018cv00759
Defendant:
John Doe and Rodderick Dunn
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Emerson Earl Palmer, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lloyd Emerson Earl Palmer, II v. Doe Administrator et al
as 4:2018cv04141
Defendant:
John Doe Administrator and Rodderick Dunn
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Emerson Earl Palmer, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palmer v. Franklin et al
as 4:2018cv04140
Defendant:
John Doe Administrator, Rodderick Dunn, Mrs. Scoggins and others
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Emerson Earl Palmer, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunahue v. Kelley et al
as 2:2018cv00103
Defendant:
Morieon Kelly, K Baxter, Wendy Kelley and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald Dunahue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunahue v. Andrews et al
as 2:2018cv00090
Plaintiff:
Reginald Dunahue
Defendant:
Jeremy C Andrews, James Dycus, Branch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palmer v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2018cv00409
Plaintiff:
Chester R Palmer, Sr
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Palmer v. Faulkner County Detention Center et al
as 4:2018cv00363
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Emerson Earl Palmer, II
Defendant:
Faulkner County Detention Center, Tim Ryals, Charles E Clawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palmer v. Miller et al
as 4:2018cv00227
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Emerson Earl Palmer, II
Defendant:
Reidmueller, Faulkner County Code Enforcement, Classen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palmer v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2018cv02062
Plaintiff:
Jason Colter Palmer
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Palmer v. Miller et al
as 4:2018cv00171
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Emerson Earl Palmer
Defendant:
Reed Miller, Jerry Stewart, Faulkner County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
