Cases 21 - 30 of 212
Coleman v. Parris et al
as 1:2022cv01225
Plaintiff:
Wesley Coleman and Welsey Dawone Coleman
Defendant:
Mike Parris, FNU Olroyed, FNU Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swain v. Parris et al
as 3:2022cv00338
Plaintiff:
Raymond X Bailey and Ron Swain
Defendant:
Michael W Parris, Anthony Hill, Justin Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adkisson et al v. Welch et al
as 3:2022cv00312
Plaintiff:
Larry M Adkisson, James T Buchanan, Jad Mubarak and others
Defendant:
Karen Welch, Larenda D McCormick, Michael W Parris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maclin v. Parris
as 3:2022cv00282
Plaintiff:
Adrian Kentron Maclin, Jr
Defendant:
Warden Mike Parris, Steve Jones, Stacey Oakes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Parris
as 2:2022cv02479
Petitioner:
Levie Roberts
Respondent:
Mike Parris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roberts v. Parris
as 3:2022cv00250
Petitioner:
Levie Roberts
Respondent:
Mike Parris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blankenship v. Parris et al
as 3:2022cv00214
Plaintiff:
Robert J Blankenship
Defendant:
Mike Parris and Wayne Bunch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wal v. Parris
as 3:2022cv00413
Petitioner:
Yangreek Tut Wal
Respondent:
Mike Parris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Combs et al v. Parris et al
as 3:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
Gary Combs and James Blackburn
Defendant:
Michael Parris, Stacey Oakes, Mr Jencks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowe v. Parris
as 3:2022cv00159
Petitioner:
Asata D Lowe
Respondent:
Mike Parris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
