Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Oliver v. Paul, et al
as 08-11178
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID LEE OLIVER
Defendant - Appellee:
TENORIO SUZZANNE PAUL, PATTY WILKINS, TIMOTHY REVELL and others
White v. Robinson et al
as 4:2008cv02178
Plaintiff:
Garry Wayne White
Defendant:
Rodney Robinson, Jeremy Cagle, Mitz Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gonzales v. Sloan et al
as 2:2008cv00080
Plaintiff:
Donaciano Gonzales
Defendant:
Paul Sloan, Joe Grimes, Ricci Mounsey and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gonzales v. Sloan et al
as 7:2008cv00047
Petitioner:
Donaciano Don Gonzales
Respondent:
Paul Sloan, Joe Grimes, Ricci Mounsey and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Miller v. Sloan et al
as 2:2007cv00217
Plaintiff:
Travis Miller
Defendant:
Paul Sloan, Robbie Stone, Kenneth Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medsker et al v. Feingold et al
as 3:2007mc00011
Plaintiff:
Thomas Medsker, Thomas J. Blum, T. H. Holloway and others
Defendant:
David J. Feingold, Darren Silverman, Kristian Baso and others
Movant:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
McGee v. Quarterman et al
as 6:2007cv00094
Plaintiff:
Johnny E. McGee, Jr.
Defendant:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman, A. D. Caskey, Paul Sloan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Risher v. Sloan et al
as 9:2007cv00066
Plaintiff:
Terry Risher
Defendant:
Paul Sloan, Frank Helm and Stacy LeBlanc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bunton v. Sloan et al
as 1:2007cv00180
Petitioner:
Dedrick Bunton
Respondent:
Paul Sloan, Michael Roesler, Gregory Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bunton v. Roesler et al
as 9:2007cv00015
Plaintiff:
Dedrick Bunton
Defendant:
Michael Roesler and Paul Sloan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
