Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Graham v. USA
as 4:2011cv03480
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Phil Jemar Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv03448
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lail et al v. United States of America, The et al
as 3:2011cv00977
Plaintiff:
Rodney Lail, James B Spencer, Irene Santacroce and others
Defendant:
United States of America, The, N John Benson, Phil Celestini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pixley v. Anders et al
as 6:2010cv01451
Defendant:
Phil Anders, Otis L Jackson, M Powell and others
Plaintiff:
Tommie Leon Pixley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Massi v. Lomonaco et al
as 0:2010cv00265
Plaintiff:
Clay Massi
Defendant:
Phil Lomonaco and Law Offices of A Philip Lomonaco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Childress et al v. Air Products and Chemicals Inc
as 6:2009cv00486
Plaintiff:
Benjamin C Childress, Benjamin C Childress, Boyce Stroud and others
Defendant:
Air Products and Chemicals Inc and Air Products and Chemicals Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gibson v. Them et al
as 8:2009cv00467
Plaintiff:
Glen Everett Gibson
Defendant:
Peter Them, Judy Munson, Robert M Ariall and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv02451
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Muhammad WKA Qadir v. Cooke et al
as 4:2008cv00498
Plaintiff:
Muhammad WKA Qadir
Defendant:
HL Cooke, John Doe, Unknown Defendants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Young v. Foot et al
as 3:2008cv00469
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Young
Defendant:
Phil Foot and County Council of Beaufort County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
