Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Gary E. Peel v. Deborah Peel, et al
as 14-3459
Debtor - Appellant: In the Matter of: GARY E. PEEL
Appellee: DEBORAH J. PEEL and DEBORAH A. PONTIOUS
Trustee - Appellee: ROBERT T. BRUEGGE, trustee of the Estate of GARY E. PEEL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00346
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Type: Bankruptcy Appeal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00154
Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
McWilliams v. Snyder et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00212
Plaintiff: Jeffrey W McWilliams
Defendant: Snyder, Skelton, Alvarez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pontious et al v. Sears Roebuck & Co et al
as 4:2011cv00613
Plaintiff: Earmel Michael Pontious and Shirley Pontious
Defendant: Sears Roebuck & Co and Char-Broil, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pontious v. Medtronic Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2011cv04069
Plaintiff: Alice Pontious
Defendant: Medtronic Inc. , Medtronic Diabetes , Medtronic Minimed, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pontious v. Townsend
as 5:2010cv01015
Plaintiff: Glen A Pontious
Defendant: Robin D Townsend
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00873
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
Pontious v. Kamco Industries, Inc., et al
as 3:2009cv00866
Plaintiff: Roger A Pontious and Roger A Pontious
Defendant: Kamco Industries, Inc., Kumi Kasei, Ltd., Co. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv01300
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?