Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Raimondo v. Armada, Village of et al
as 2:2013cv14773
Plaintiff:
Joseph Raimondo
Defendant:
Armada, Village of, Meadowbrook Claims Services, Garan, Lucow, Miller P.C. Thomas F Myers and others
Reilly v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2013cv01096
Plaintiff:
William Douglas Reilly
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
O'Reilly v. USA
as 2:2013cv13075
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Timothy Dennis O'Reilly
Reilly v. Biomet, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv15255
Plaintiff:
William Reilly
Defendant:
Biomet, Inc. and Biomet Orthopedics, LLC
Reilly v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv13733
Plaintiff:
Tammi Reilly
Defendant:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation , J.P. Morgan Chase Bank , National Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Reilly v. Michigan Department of Corrections
as 2:2010cv13826
Plaintiff:
Joshua Reilly
Defendant:
Seetha Vadlamudi , Phillip E. Payne , Terry D. Smith and others
Reilly v. Cambridge Technology Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv11737
Plaintiff:
Daniel F Reilly
Defendant:
Cambridge Technology Enterprises, Inc., Cambridge Technology Enterprises, LTD and Reilly & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reilly v. Vadlamudi et al
as 2:2009cv13832
Plaintiff:
Joshua Reilly
Defendant:
Seetha Vadlamudi, Phillip E Payne, Terry D. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Other Statutes
Reilly v. Michigan Department of Corrections
as 1:2009cv00892
Plaintiff:
Joshua Reilly
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Other Civil Rights
Employers Mutual Casualty Company v. Reilly Plating Company
as 2:2008cv12145
Plaintiff:
Employers Mutual Casualty Company
Defendant:
Reilly Plating Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
