Cases 21 - 30 of 84
Jallah v. North Dakota, State of
as 1:2018cv00227
Petitioner:
Richard Kolubah Jallah
Respondent:
North Dakota, State of and Leann Bertsch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gebhards v. Total Service Supply, L.P. et al
as 1:2018cv00111
Plaintiff:
Sandra Gebhards
Defendant:
Total Service Supply, L.P., John Parris, Jr., G. W. Rider and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794
Wahl v. Trustmark Insurance Company (Mutual)
as 3:2017cv00184
Plaintiff:
Richard Wahl and Karen Wahl
Defendant:
Trustmark Insurance Company (Mutual)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gonzalez v. Shahin et al
as 1:2017cv00157
Plaintiff:
Marco Gonzalez
Defendant:
Salem Shahin, M.D. , Carol Gilmore, M.D. , Richard Martin, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Everett v. Marks et al
as 1:2017cv00136
Plaintiff:
Tilmer Everett
Defendant:
Roger Marks, III, Dean Clarkson, Dan Donlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maheu et al v. XTO Energy Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00102
Plaintiff:
Richard Chadwick Maheu , Janie Williams , Joseph C. Guillen and others
Defendant:
XTO Energy Inc., Badlands Consulting, LLC, Petroleum Experience, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smuda v. Anderson et al
as 3:2016cv00335
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen Smuda
Defendant:
Maggie Anderson and Wayne Stenehjem
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawlar et al v. Oasis Petroleum North America LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00241
Plaintiff:
Lawlar, Richard Lawlar and Shirlene Lawlar
Defendant:
Oasis Petroleum North America LLC, Oasis Petroleum LLC and Oasis Midstream Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
