Cases 21 - 30 of 187
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
RILEY v. REAGLE
as 1:2022cv02001
Petitioner:
KEVIN DEREK RILEY
Respondent:
DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01693
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
DENT v. BYRD et al
as 2:2022cv00341
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DENT
Defendant:
SAMUEL JONATHAN BYRD, A. RILEY, S. FISCHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FOOTE v. SCHALK et al
as 1:2022cv01247
Plaintiff:
GEORGE A. FOOTE, Jr.
Defendant:
DAVID SCHALK, ERIK ALLEN, PATRICIA RILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RILEY v. NOWAKOWSKI
as 2:2022cv00206
Plaintiff:
DEXTER L. RILEY
Defendant:
BONNIE NOWAKOWSKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLANTON v. LITTLEJOHN et al
as 3:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
ZACHARIAH C.J. BLANTON
Defendant:
FRANK LITTLEJOHN, DAN MITCHELL, NATHAN LAGENOUR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAYS v. GEO GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00651
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. MAYS
Defendant:
GEO GROUP, INC., CENTURION HEALTH, WEXFORD OF INDIANA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAYERS v. MARION SUPERIOR COURT
as 1:2022cv00128
Plaintiff:
TANISHA MAYERS
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, PAIGE BOVA KERVAN, CHRITINE KERL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
RILEY v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
CLINTON RILEY
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, GWEN HORTH, THOR MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
