Cases 21 - 30 of 113
Arkels et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2019cv11308
Plaintiff:
Bradley Luckhart, Bobby Bolden, Mason Morris and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC, Robert Bosch GmbH and Robert Bosch LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Rodgers v. Eisel et al
as 2:2019cv10809
Plaintiff:
Andre Rodgers
Defendant:
Heather Glowacz, Detroit, City of and Corey Eisel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Kensu v. Corizon, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv10616
Defendant:
Keith Papendick, William Borgerding, Chris Steece and others
Plaintiff:
Temujin Kensu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kensu v. Corizon, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv10615
Defendant:
Keith Papendick, William Borgerding, Chris Steece and others
Plaintiff:
Temujin Kensu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Depositors Insurance Company v. Trane U.S., Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv13596
Defendant:
Trane U.S., Inc. and White-Rodgers Company
Plaintiff:
Depositors Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lockard et al v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2018cv13045
Defendant:
Officer Amy Matelic, Arthur Leavells, Sgt. Stephen Geelhood and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Lockard and Adam Santiago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodgers v. Oakland County et al
as 2:2018cv12832
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, Oakland County and Michael J. Bouchard
Plaintiff:
Dujuan Keith Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin et al v. SNYDER et al
as 2:2018cv11967
Plaintiff:
Shyron Franklin , Helene White , P. T.1 and others
Defendant:
RICHARD D. SNYDER , Flint, City of, Receivership Transition Advisory Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox et al v. SNYDER et al
as 2:2018cv11770
Plaintiff:
Darlene Cox , Mary Cox , Michael Cross and others
Defendant:
RICHARD D. SNYDER , City of Flint, Receivership Transition Advisory Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00592
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
