Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Colfin AI-CA 5, LLC v. Ramon Ramirez et al
as 2:2013cv08652
Defendant:
All Occupants in Possession, Does, Juan Lopez and others
Plaintiff:
Colfin AI-CA 5, LLC
United States of America v. Cuevas (Juan)
as 13-4271
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jose Cuevas, Edward Vidal, Alcides Hernandez and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Juan Cuevas
Colin AI-CA 5, LLC v. Ramon Ramirez et al
as 2:2013cv08049
Defendant:
All Occupants in Possession, Does, Ramon Ramirez and others
Plaintiff:
Colin AI-CA 5, LLC
Ramirez v. Ms. Parker et al
as 1:2013cv03268
Plaintiff:
Ramon Ramirez
Defendant:
Ms. Parker and Warden of Vernon C. Bain Center M.T.F. III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramon Ramirez Romero v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-71426
Petitioner:
RAMON RAMIREZ ROMERO
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Ramon Ramirez v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC et al
as 5:2013cv00595
Defendant:
Aurora Loan Services LLC, Does, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Ramon Ramirez
Olivieri et al v. Wal-Mart, Inc. et al
as 6:2013cv00449
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Olivieri and Ramon Ramirez
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Claims Management, Inc., John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Thomas Miller et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2012cv05361
Defendant:
Officer Vicenzo Averaimo, City of Los Angeles, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Nikolay Hallabyan, Nathan Miller, Patrick Miller and others
Francisco Ramirez, Jr. v. Pat Vasque
as 12-55231
Petitioner - Appellant:
FRANCISCO RAMON RAMIREZ, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
PAT L. VASQUES, Warden
United States of America v. Cuevas (Jose Cuevas)
as 11-4890
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Rigoberto Tavares, Arelis Vidal, AKA Lourdes Vidal, Rafael Paz and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Jose Cuevas, AKA Chencho, AKA Checho
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
