Cases 21 - 30 of 511
Richardson v. Warden of Dauphin County Prison et al
as 1:2022cv01616
Petitioner:
John Joseph Richardson
Respondent:
Warden of Dauphin County Prison and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richardson v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv01493
Plaintiff:
Ruth Richardson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
DAVISE v. CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2022cv03760
Plaintiff:
MARQUISE DAVISE and MARQUISS DAVIS
Defendant:
CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, OFFICER N. MUHAMMAD, OFFICER T. FELTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NAESSENS v. BRESLIN et al
as 2:2022cv03636
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GERARD NAESSENS
Defendant:
FRANK BRESLIN, ANDREW J. BARRON, LAWRENCE H. RICHARDSON, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
COHEN v. RICHARDSON
as 2:2022cv02828
Plaintiff:
MARTIN L. COHEN
Defendant:
RUSSELL RICHARDSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RICHARDSON v. FITZGERALD et al
as 2:2022cv00959
Plaintiff:
KEITH RICHARDSON
Defendant:
RICH FITZGERALD, ORLANDO HARPER and ADAM SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHARDSON v. WARDEN OF FCI LORETTO
as 3:2022cv00096
Petitioner:
QURAN S. RICHARDSON
Respondent:
WARDEN OF FCI LORETTO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
RICHARDSON v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2022cv02312
Plaintiff:
BARBARA RICHARDSON
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
