Cases 21 - 30 of 131
In re: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company C-8 Personal Injury Litigation
as 2:2013md02433
Plaintiff:
Anita Yerby, Roberta Sue Daugherty-Hall, Kathryn J. Post and others
Interested Party:
National Geographic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Catchings v. State of Alabama et al
as 1:2020cv01692
Respondent:
State of Alabama and Steve Giddens
Petitioner:
Robert Keith Catchings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CHAPMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv80320
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KEITH CHAPMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Glassheim v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02994
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robert Keith Glassheim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KEITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv43957
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KEITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOWLIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv35885
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KEITH BOWLIN
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv95019
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KEITH JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MUNDY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv67456
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KEITH MUNDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv24986
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KEITH WILSON
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
