Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Robert Merritt v. Gregory Polinsky, et al
as 19-1623
Defendant / Appellee:
LYNN, DIRECTOR OF ADAPPT CEC, CAROL SCHULTZ, HEARING EXAMINER OF PAROLE BOARD, GREGORY POLINSKY, PAROLE AGENT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT MERRITT
Merritt v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2018cv01880
Petitioner:
Robert Merritt
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MERRITT v. RIMMER et al
as 5:2018cv02910
Defendant:
CORSI, RIMMER, ROBERT DONCHEZ and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MERRITT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MERRITT v. POINSKY et al
as 5:2018cv00213
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MERRITT
Defendant:
GREGORY POINSKY, DAVID BARADGIE, LYNN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Merritt v. Crete Carrier Corporation
as 3:2015cv01222
Plaintiff:
Robert Merritt
Defendant:
Crete Carrier Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USA v. Robert Merritt
as 14-3975
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT MERRITT, a/k/a CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BISHOP, a/k/a B.J., agent of DIRT
MERRITT v. GULLO
as 5:2014cv05528
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MERRITT
Defendant:
STEVEN GULLO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Robert Merritt
as 14-3152
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT MERRITT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MERRITT v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2014cv03209
Petitioner:
ROBERT MERRITT
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF NORTHAMPTON COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
MERRITT v. BUSKIRK et al
as 5:2013cv00898
Petitioner:
ROBERT MERRITT
Respondent:
TODD BUSKIRK, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
