Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Taylor #377991 v. Smith et al
as 2:2014cv00175
Plaintiff:
Terrence Lee Taylor #377991
Defendant:
S. Smith, J. Clark, Robert Norton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norton v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv00646
Plaintiff:
Julius Robert Norton
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Hannon #313200 v. Woods et al
as 2:2014cv00019
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Hannon #313200
Defendant:
Jeffrey Woods, C. Knipe, Unknown Conners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hannon #313200 v. Woods et al
as 2:2013cv00247
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Hannon #313200
Defendant:
Jeffrey Woods, C. Knipe, C. Sellick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00243
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sanford #173719 v. Heyns et al
as 2:2012cv00426
Plaintiff:
James Frederick Sanford #173719
Defendant:
Daniel H. Heyns, Michigan Department of Corrections, Jeffrey Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blum et al v. Internal Fixation Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv23137
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Blum , Bromson Investment LTD , Beauperthuy Enterprises and others
Defendant:
Internal Fixation Systems, Inc. , Stephen J. Dresnick , Jay Higgins and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 Securities Exchange Act
Norton v. Parks et al
as 1:2012cv03834
Plaintiff:
Robert Norton
Defendant:
Michael Parks, M.D. , Daniel Maalouf, M.D. and Hospital For Special Surgery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NORTON v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 5:2011cv00275
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ROBERT NORTON, III
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown #224137 v. Harrington et al
as 2:2011cv00252
Plaintiff:
Gregory Brown #224137
Defendant:
Patrick Harrington and Robert Norton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
