Cases 21 - 30 of 69
Dixon v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv01827
Plaintiff:
Denise Dixon
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, John E. Wetzel, Robert Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCormick v. State Correctional Institution Muncy et al
as 4:2017cv01688
Plaintiff:
Josie McCormick
Defendant:
State Correctional Institution Muncy , Matthew Allabach and Robert Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schultz v. Smith et al
as 3:2017cv01602
Petitioner:
Wendy Ann Schultz
Respondent:
Robert Smith and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Levanduski v. Smith et al
as 1:2017cv01341
Petitioner:
TeriLynn Levanduski
Respondent:
Robert Smith, PA State Attorney General and Monroe County District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HARRELL v. SMITH et al
as 2:2017cv02813
Petitioner:
THOMASINA HARRELL
Respondent:
ROBERT SMITH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bickhart v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2017cv00873
Plaintiff:
Nancy Bickhart
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Robert Smith, Candy Otte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone et al v. Waltman et al
as 4:2017cv00864
Plaintiff:
Donald J. Stone and Deborah L. Stone
Defendant:
Shawn Waltman , James Wool , Correct Care Solutions, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schweikert v. Geyer et al
as 3:2017cv00009
Plaintiff:
Samantha Schweikert
Defendant:
Jeffrey Geyer, Troy D. Sellers , William Frantz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KENNEY v. SMITH, et al
as 3:2016cv00264
Petitioner:
ROWLANDA-LEA KENNEY
Respondent:
ROBERT SMITH and PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kenney v. Smith et al
as 3:2016cv02449
Petitioner:
Rowlanda-Lea Kenney
Respondent:
Robert Smith and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
