Cases 21 - 30 of 78
Chandler v. Smith et al
as 3:2018cv00029
Plaintiff:
Buster Chandler
Defendant:
Aaron Smith, Rodney Ballard, Anna Valintine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arriola et al v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 3:2017cv00100
Plaintiff:
Antonio Arriola , Keath Bramblett , Christopher Hopper and others
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky , Commonwealth of Kentucky Cabinet for Justice and Public Safety , Commonwealth of Kentucky Corrections Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dishman et al v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 0:2017cv00098
Plaintiff:
Kelly Dishman and A. D.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Kentucky Justice and Public Safety Cabinet, Kentucky Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caldwell v. Ballard et al
as 3:2017cv00467
Plaintiff:
Jared Caldwell
Defendant:
Rodney Ballard , Frederick Kemen, MD , Aimee Mihalyov, ARPN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Phillips v. Ballard et al
as 5:2017cv00301
Plaintiff:
Johnny R. Phillips
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe(s), Rodney Ballard, Brad Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Human Rights Defense Center v. Ballard et al
as 3:2017cv00057
Plaintiff:
Human Rights Defense Center
Defendant:
Rodney Ballard , Jim Erwin , Kimberly Potter-Blair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aubrey Williams, II v. Randy White, et al
as 17-5627
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AUBREY WILLIAMS, II
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY L. WHITE, Warden, Kentucky State Penitentiary at Eddyville and RODNEY BALLARD, Kentucky Department of Corrections Commissioner
Caldwell v. Ballard et al
as 3:2017cv00041
Plaintiff:
Jared Caldwell
Defendant:
Rodney Ballard , Frederick Kemen, MD , Aimee Mihalyov, ARPN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thome v. Bevin et al
as 3:2017cv00269
Plaintiff:
Thomas Thome
Defendant:
Matt Bevin, Unknown Defendants 1-?, Rodney Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
