Cases 21 - 30 of 42
RUCKER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2012cv03997
Plaintiff:
KENYATA RUCKER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LOUIS GIORLA, JOHN DELANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUCKER et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv01036
Plaintiff:
REGINALD RUCKER , DARLENE RUCKER , JAMES ROURKE and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RUCKER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv50919
Plaintiff:
PAUL E. RUCKER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
RUCKER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv05417
Plaintiff:
BLAIR RUCKER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and MENTAL HEALTH MANAGEMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RANDOLPH v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2011cv03396
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL B. RANDOLPH, IV
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, JEFFREY BEARD, SHIRLEY MOORE-SMEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUCKER v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv64827
Plaintiff:
HARLIE A RUCKER, JR
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RUCKER et al v. BULL LINES et al
as 2:2011cv33367
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN RUCKER and CREIGHTON E MILLER
Defendant:
BULL LINES
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BOLDEN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2011cv00467
Plaintiff:
MARY BELINDA BOLDEN
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE BUREAU OF PRISONS IN PENNA., JEROME STRICKLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUCKER v. CURLEY et al
as 2:2011cv00082
Petitioner:
LANCE RUCKER
Respondent:
MICHAEL CURLEY , THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RUCKER v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2010cv02986
Petitioner:
MICHAEL RUCKER
Respondent:
BRIAN COLEMAN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
