Cases 21 - 30 of 221
Fahr et al v. City of San Diego, California et al
as 3:2021cv01676
Plaintiff:
James Fahr, Desiree Bergman, Colin Rudolph and others
Defendant:
City of San Diego, California and David Nisleit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv
Bivens v. Rudolph (Bivens)
as 1:2021cv01152
Plaintiff:
Ginesha Bivens
Defendant:
Linda Rudolph (Bivens)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Davis et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 3:2021cv05298
Defendant:
Wilbur-Ellis Nutrition, LLC, Monsanto Company, Wilbur-Ellis Company, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
William Davis, David Donaldson, Bruce W. Mack and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rudolph v. Saul
as 3:2021cv00919
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Toni Dawn Rudolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 id
Giles v. San Joaquin Valley Rehabilitation Hospital et al
as 1:2021cv00732
Defendant:
Mary Jo Jacobson, Connie Pierce, Vibra Healthcare and others
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Giles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
(PC) Luedtke v. Griesbach et al
as 1:2021cv00718
Defendant:
Anthony Ishii, Dale Drozd, Kirk Obear and others
Plaintiff:
James Luedtke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rudoph Herrera v. Occupational Health Centers of California et al
as 2:2021cv03468
Defendant:
Concentra Group Holdings, LLC and Occupational Health Centers of California
Plaintiff:
Rudolph Herrera
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 2011
Moralez v. Davis
as 5:2021cv01779
Defendant:
Ron Davis
Plaintiff:
Rudolph Herrera Moralez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jessica Rudolph v. City of Long Beach et al
as 2:2021cv01092
Plaintiff:
Jessica Rudolph
Defendant:
City of Long Beach, DOES and DOES 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2021cv00713
Plaintiff:
Anthony Louis Sam, Elaine T. Berrio, Angela T. Mitchell and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
