Cases 21 - 30 of 102
WARD v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00507
Petitioner:
DAMOND WARD
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
TILLISY v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00492
Plaintiff:
MUHAMMED Z. TILLISY
Defendant:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
HARGRAVE v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00488
Petitioner:
DEONTAE J. HARGRAVE
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
SMITH v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00472
Petitioner:
BRIAN SMITH
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
JOHNSON v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00448
Petitioner:
JAMES H. JOHNSON
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
DAVENPORT v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00426
Petitioner:
LAVANCE DAVENPORT
Respondent:
RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
MERCHANT v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00398
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ALLEN MERCHANT
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
MCNEELEY v. RULE
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2023cv00305
Petitioner:
JESSE MCNEELEY
Respondent:
RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
ALI v. UNITED STATES CITIZENS et al
as 2:2023cv00300
Plaintiff:
HASAN ALI and RONNIE JACKSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CITIZENS, T. RULE, S. KALLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
FLETCHER v. RULE et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2023cv00306
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L. FLETCHER
Defendant:
T. RULE, DEUSCH, MAKELLAR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.