Cases 21 - 30 of 469
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Akers v. The Dow Chemical Company, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
Russell R. Akers
Defendant:
The Dow Chemical Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Kimp v. Nowakowski et al
as 5:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Timmy Jerome Kimp
Defendant:
Dr. Bonnie Nowakowski and Warden Russell Heisner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Cooper et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
Russell Cooper and Diana S. Cooper
Defendant:
United States of America and Bridgett Freeman, FNP-BC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Newell v. Wolfe
as 5:2022cv00021
Petitioner:
Russell Newell
Respondent:
R. M. Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cooper v. Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00035
Plaintiff:
Russell Cooper and Diana S. Cooper
Defendant:
Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc., Abdulkader Farran, M.D., Greta Guyer, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Carroll v. Maston et al
as 3:2021cv00189
Plaintiff:
Jason Glenn Carroll
Defendant:
Russell Maston, Karen Townson and Betsey Jividen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Akers v. Quality Carriers, Inc.
as 2:2021cv00660
Plaintiff:
Russell R. Akers
Defendant:
Quality Carriers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cutlip v. Rollyson et al
as 1:2021cv00138
Plaintiff:
Donald Cutlip
Defendant:
G. Russell Rollyson, Jr. and WVTH LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ballenger v. Maston et al
as 3:2021cv00106
Plaintiff:
William Julius Ballenger
Defendant:
William Julius Maston, Russell Maston, Shawn Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
