Cases 21 - 30 of 100
KIN v. SCI FAYETTE et al
as 2:2021cv00074
Defendant:
RUDOLPHE STARK and SCI FAYETTE
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PAUL KIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HERRING v. SCI FAYETTE
as 2:2021cv00057
Plaintiff:
STANLEY HERRING
Defendant:
SCI FAYETTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
KLING v. SCI FAYETTE
as 2:2021cv00016
Defendant:
SCI FAYETTE
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. KLING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Landing v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania et al
as 5:2020cv05946
Respondent:
Warden of SCI-Fayette, PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE and COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
Stefon T. Landing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Luis NievesIn re: Luis Nieves
as 20-3376
Respondent:
WARDEN MARK CAPOZA, SCI Fayette State Prison, WARDEN TIM BETTI, Lackawanna County Prison, VITO P. GEROULO and others
Debtor:
TRISHA PRICE CORBETT
Petitioner:
In re: LUIS NIEVES
Landing v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2020cv01987
Respondent:
Warden of SCI-Fayette, Pennsylvania Attorney General Office and Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania
Petitioner:
Stefan T Landing and Stefon T. Landing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2020cv00663
Defendant:
JANE DOE, JOHN WETZEL, JOHN/JANE DOE'S and others
Plaintiff:
RASHAD WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
KINARD v. SCI FAYETTE et al
as 2:2020cv02047
Respondent:
SCI FAYETTE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF JOSH SHAPIRO and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Petitioner:
KEITH KINARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2020cv00653
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Michael Oppman, Jane Doe, - and others
Plaintiff:
Rashad Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PROVITT v. SERGEANT TANNER et al
as 2:2019cv01624
Defendant:
SERGEANT TANNER, NURSE BRENT, Physician Assistant DARLA COWDEN and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. PROVITT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
