Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Warren Easley v. Lisa Hollibaugh, et al
as 21-1809
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WARREN EASLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
C.O. GARY HORTON and LISA HOLLIBAUGH, SCI-Smithfield
INGRAM v. SCI SMITHFIELD, et al
as 2:2021cv00359
Defendant:
SCI SMITHFIELD UNIT MANAGER RUNK, DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF PAROLE KIRK C. LOOSI, C. GORMAN and others
Plaintiff:
KAI D. INGRAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Johnson v. Warden of SCI-Smithfield et al
as 1:2020cv02412
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and Warden of SCI-Smithfield
Petitioner:
Derrick Eugene Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Perez-Rivera v. Harper et al
as 1:2020cv02257
Defendant:
W. Dreibelbis, John Doe (2), John Doe (1) and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan A. Perez-Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mehl v. Warden of SCI-Smithfield et al
as 1:2020cv00616
Respondent:
Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania, Warden of SCI-Smithfield and PA State Attorney General
Petitioner:
Ryan Mehl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Warden of SCI-Smithfield
as 1:2020cv00251
Respondent:
Warden of SCI-Smithfield and Pennsylvania Attorney General Office
Petitioner:
Derrick Eugene Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Darren Eades v. John Wetzel, et al
as 19-3821
Defendant / Appellee:
MS. P. LUTHER, Superintendent, SCI Smithfield, MR. RUPERT, Records Specialist Supervisor, SCI Smithfield, DEBRA JADLOCKI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARREN EADES
Mehl v. SCI-Smithfield
as 1:2019cv01357
Petitioner:
Ryan Andrew Mehl
Respondent:
SCI-Smithfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RUSSELL v. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2017cv02386
Plaintiff:
IAN M. RUSSELL
Defendant:
State of Pennsylvania, SCI-Smithfield, Eric Tice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUSSELL v. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2017cv05476
Plaintiff:
IAN M. RUSSELL
Defendant:
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, SCI-SMITHFIELD, ERIC TICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
