Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Scott and White Health Plan v. DST Pharmacy Solutions, Inc.
as 6:2019cv00263
Plaintiff:
Scott and White Health Plan
Defendant:
DST Pharmacy Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
ABC Services Group, Inc. v. Health Net of California, Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv00243
Plaintiff:
ABC Services Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Health Net, Inc., Health Net Life Insurance Company, CENTENE CORPORATION and others
Special Master:
Stephen G Larson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Scott and White Health Plan, et al. v. United Air Ambulance, LLC
as 6:2019cv00012
Plaintiff:
Scott and White Health Plan
Defendant:
United Air Ambulance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
C.C. et al v. Baylor Scott & White Health et al
as 4:2018cv00828
Defendant:
Baylor Scott & White Holdings, Baylor Scott & White Health, Baylor Scott and White Health and Welfare Plan and others
Plaintiff:
D. C., C. C., H. C. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Lowe v. Scott and White Health Plan
as 4:2018cv00791
Plaintiff:
Marvin B Lowe
Defendant:
Scott and White Health Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00545
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Quenstedt v. Scott and White Health Plan
as 5:2018cv00378
Plaintiff:
Scott Quenstedt
Defendant:
Scott and White Health Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal - ERISA
White v. Berryhill
as 5:2017cv01238
Plaintiff:
Scott Francis White
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv00248
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Employment Discrimination on Basis of Disability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
