Cases 21 - 30 of 663
Barclay v. Dixon
as 24-92
Defendant / Appellee:
MAKAYLA COOK, Police Officer, Sandusky Police Department, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Makayla Cook, TIM MCCONAHAY, Warden, Mansfield Correctional Facility, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Tim Mcconahay, ROBERT A. DIXON, Attorney, Attorney at Law, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Robert A. Dixon and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LESHAWN MAURICE BARCLAY, a Moor beneficiary, a Emperor, Admiral, Mariner, Merchant, Piloter a private Moor aboriginal ohioan national, and subject of the Al Maroc Shereefian Empire
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Cuixiao Zhang v. Secretary of Dept. of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2024cv00150
Petitioner:
Cuixiao Zhang
Respondent:
Secretary of Homeland Security, Director of USCIS, Director of USCIS Los Angeles District and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Jieri Leng v. Secretary of Dept. of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2024cv00149
Petitioner:
Jieri Leng
Respondent:
Secretary of Homeland Security, Director of USCIS, Director of USCIS Los Angeles District and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Ifeji et al v. garland et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Jazzlyn Shabera Ifeji, Jazzlyn Shabera Ifeji Estate et al., Joseph Eddie Pryor Estate et al. and others
Defendant:
merrick garland attorney general et al., United States Department of Justice HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as MERRICK GARLAND, andrew saul commissioner et al., Social Security Administration HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as ANDREW SAUL, janet louise yellen secretary of the treasury et al., United States Department of the Treasury HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as JANET LOUISE YELLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Motley v. Janae Rocquel Motley Estate
as 24-1
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANAE ROCQUEL MOTLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
JANAE ROCQUEL MOTLEY ESTATE, beneficiary JANAE ROCQUEL MOTLEY, DYMARION RASHAD BROOKS ESTATE, beneficiary DYMARION RASHAD BROOKS, DERRION RASHAD BROOKS ESTATE, beneficiary DERRION RASHAD BROOKS and others
JOHNSON et al v. HOLBROOK et al
as 2:2023cv05154
Plaintiff:
ANDRE LEMAURIO JOHNSON, AMUUR MATIYN ZAAKIR EL TRUST, ANDRE LEMAURIO JOHNSON ET AL and others
Defendant:
THOMAS HOLBROOK doing business as THOMAS HOLBROOK, ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY C HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, EZIKE NGO D/B/A EZIKE BGO: ILLINOIS DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC HEALTH HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as EZIKE NGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02853
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Conklin v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
as 23-8003
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK T. CONKLIN
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Defendant:
AFOD FRANZ JEUDY, DFODs SCOTT MECHKOWSKI, DARIUS REEVES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
