Cases 21 - 30 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv03194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv03179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv00275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv03177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Armitage v. Faith Regional Physician Services, LLC
as 8:2026cv00255
Plaintiff:
Lori Armitage
Defendant:
Faith Regional Physician Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Jones v. Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 8:2026cv00253
Plaintiff:
Marvel Jones
Defendant:
Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services, Steve Corsi, Thomas Janousek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Simmons et al
as 8:2026cv00249
Plaintiff:
Marvel Jones
Defendant:
Kristine Boe Simmons, Don Whitmire, Marsha Schwartz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv03164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Diaz Lopez v. Edlow et al
as 4:2026cv03161
Plaintiff:
Jose Diaz Lopez
Defendant:
Joseph B. Edlow, USCIS, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and Marco Rubio
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Kaplan v. Insurance Agency Marketing Services, Inc.
as 4:2026cv03159
Plaintiff:
Jacob Kaplan
Defendant:
Insurance Agency Marketing Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
