Cases 21 - 30 of 613
Chatman, Sr. v. State of Indiana, The et al
as 3:2023cv00968
Petitioner:
Albert D.M. Chatman, Sr.
Respondent:
State of Indiana, The, (f/n/u) Reddman, (f/n/u) Olmstead and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Anderson, Sr. v. Madison County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv01185
Plaintiff:
Dontavious Montez Anderson, Sr.
Defendant:
Madison County Jail, Madison County Sheriff's Department, Hunter Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown, Sr. v. Lee
as 1:2023cv01184
Plaintiff:
James D. Brown, Sr.
Defendant:
Robert James Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopson v. GPM Investments, LLC
as 2:2023cv00105
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hopson, Sr.
Defendant:
GPM Investments LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Grooms v. Cox et al
as 2:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Cedric Jordan Grooms, Sr.
Defendant:
Casey Cox, Tim Clafflin, John Griffith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kyle et al v.
as 1:2023mc00024
Petitioner:
Lowell H Kyle, Sr, Colton Drake Clingan, Larry Leland Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins Sr. et al v. Davidson County et al
as 3:2023cv00730
Plaintiff:
Jerome A. Perkins Sr. and Temeshia Trammell
Defendant:
Davidson County, Davidson County Sheriff Dept. and Daron Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hopson v. GPM Investments LLC
as 2:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hopson, Sr.
Defendant:
GPM Investments LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Lester v. Shepard et al
as 1:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
Stephen D Lester, Sr.
Defendant:
Chief Shepard, Chief Garrett, Captain Hargis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
