Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 72
Lindensmith v. Petchow et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv10644
Plaintiff: David Lindensmith
Defendant: Petchow, Stephen DeBoer and Jane E Price
Sareini #203519 v. Michigan Parole Board et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00037
Plaintiff: Ali Sareini #203519
Defendant: Michigan Parole Board, Tom Combs, Barbara Sampson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. DeBoer et al
as 2:2012cv10252
Plaintiff: Cleveland Rogers
Defendant: Stephen DeBoer , John Sullivan and Tom Combs
Shelton v. DeBoer
as 2:2011cv14179
Plaintiff: Keith Shelton
Defendant: Stephen DeBoer
Catanzaro #313263 v. Harry et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00867
Petitioner: Matthew Catanzaro #313263
Respondent: Shirlee Harry, Stephen DeBoer, Paul Condino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Catanzaro #313263 v. Harry et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00868
Plaintiff: Matthew Catanzaro #313263
Defendant: S. Harry, Stephen DeBoer, Paul Condino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frank Nali v. Jodi Angelo, et al
as 11-1625
Plaintiff - Appellant: FRANK NALI
Defendant - Appellee: JODI ANGELO, LAURIN THOMAS, JAMES ATTERBERRY and others
Coates #155262 v. Sampson et al
as 1:2011cv00385
Plaintiff: Emanuel Shawn Coates #155262
Defendant: Barbara S. Sampson, Stephen DeBoer, John Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Dionne v. Barbara Sampson, et al
as 11-1477
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL DIONNE
Defendant - Appellee: BARBARA S. SAMPSON, JAMES ATTERBERRY, MIGUAL BERRIOS and others
Coates v. Sampson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv11078
Plaintiff: Emanuel Coates
Defendant: Barbara Sampson, Stephen DeBoer and John Sullivan

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?