Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Bowden v. Scarborough et al
as 2:2019cv00655
Defendant:
EAS Sensorense Inc, Mary Scarborough, Others Unknown and others
Plaintiff:
Albertha Bowden
Mack et al v. Wells Fargo Financial South Carolina et al
as 2:2018cv01489
Plaintiff:
Vincent D Mack and Paula D Mack
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Financial South Carolina, Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Caliber Home Loans Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Al-Mujahidin v. McCall et al
as 9:2018cv01163
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Al-Mujahidin
Defendant:
Michael McCall, Meagan Harris, Daniel Harouff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braxton v. Boyd et al
as 8:2018cv00959
Plaintiff:
Michael T Braxton
Defendant:
A Boyd, C York, Donnie Stonebreaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Canada v. Stirling et al
as 5:2017cv02785
Plaintiff:
Kelvin A Canada
Defendant:
Bryan P Stirling, Michael McCall, Joette Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Al-Haqq v. Scarborough et al
as 2:2017cv00534
Plaintiff:
Bilal A Al-Haqq
Defendant:
Joette D Scarborough and AW Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Logan v. Black Lives Matter Organization et al
as 6:2016cv02599
Plaintiff:
Jack Logan
Defendant:
Black Lives Matter Organization, Patrisse Cullers, Opal Tometi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. McCall et al
as 8:2016cv01112
Plaintiff:
Brian Franklin Evans
Defendant:
Michael McCall, Donika Gray, Joette D Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McBride et al v. Weston Adams Law Firm et al
as 2:2015cv01704
Plaintiff:
Clayton McBride and Pauline Baker McBride
Defendant:
Weston Adams Law Firm, JP Morgan Chase, Jamie Dimon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gregg-Wilson v. Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP et al
as 3:2015cv00807
Plaintiff:
Michael Gregg-Wilson
Defendant:
Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP, Sue Erwin Harper, Foley & Lardner LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
