Cases 21 - 30 of 128
Shaw v. Austin
as 1:2022cv00428
Plaintiff:
Bernadetta Shaw
Defendant:
Lloyd J. Austin, III
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Gogel, et al v. Smith, et al
as 3:2022cv00239
Plaintiff:
Gilbrith Gogel, Puranjyot Chaggar, Ashanti Holland and others
Defendant:
William Smith, Antoinette V. Irving, E. M. Konopka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lumumba et al v. Clarke et al
as 7:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
Askari Dansa M.S. Lumumba, John Beverly, Anthony Shaw and others
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, A. David Robinson, David Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grishaw v. Shaw et al
as 7:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
Larry Grishaw, Jr.
Defendant:
Lt. Shaw and Medical Personel of Blue Ridge Jail Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Kijakazi
as 3:2021cv00727
Plaintiff:
Jodi Lynn Shaw
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Charlery v. Riddick et al
as 1:2021cv01268
Plaintiff:
Jwa E. Charlery
Defendant:
Riddick, Correctional Officer Turner, Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Shaw
as 7:2021cv00545
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Allen Miller
Defendant:
Lt. Matthew Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morley v. Edmonds et al
as 2:2021cv00359
Defendant:
LT. Conyers, Ofc. Turner, Ms. Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Eliott Morley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Perry et al
as 2:2021cv00031
Defendant:
Ofc. Cornelius Bland, Officer Mr. Lockhart, Ofc. Ms. Bernard and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berkley v. Northam et al
as 3:2020cv00674
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Christy Jones, A. David Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Issac Berkley, III and Isaac Berkley, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
