Cases 21 - 30 of 128
Robertson v. Davis et al
as 4:2023cv00494
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Robertson
Defendant:
Donna Davis, Cynthia Conway, Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Payne
as 4:2023cv00300
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lee Reed
Defendant:
Shipman and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duncan v. Shipman et al
as 4:2023cv00294
Plaintiff:
Tyrone L Duncan
Defendant:
J Shipman, A Johnson and M Culclager
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ferguson v. Payne et al
as 4:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Edward Ferguson
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Cantrell Bass, Maurice Culclager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunahue v. Straughn et al
as 2:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Reginald Dunahue
Defendant:
William F Straughn, Maurice Culclager, C Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Arkansas Division of Correction et al
as 4:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Deverick Scott
Defendant:
Arkansas Division of Correction, B Carroll, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duke v. Freeman et al
as 4:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Caelin S Duke
Defendant:
William Freeman, Benjamin Caple, Joseph P Mahoney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv01201
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William Straughn, Dale Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson et al v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv00796
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Robertson
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Dale Reed, William Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chism v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv00730
Plaintiff:
Nathan Harold Chism
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Marshal Dale Reed, Jennifer Carl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
